|From: nicola andrews <celticmoondance
Subject: Re: SPEECH
To: retroactivism2000 at yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 8:10 PM
|That's a way to
get round it. Good one!
The free speech was always for Noby himself when he started
his own site (nOby's) because he wasn't wanted on the sites
that he was on (I met him on former Osho Beyond Bondage
Yahoo site). He was deliberately provocative there unlike
Wyley. Noby then did a public relations campaign on how he
guaranteed free speech on his own site. Of course he
doesn't really believe in free speech unless it's for him (like
all dictators). Wyley has got to him (which is a good thing
for Noby to look at).
Your da Man! Rock on.
| Of course he
doesn't really believe in free speech ...
(like all dictators).