Mon, 13 Nov 2006 06:50:50 -0800
|
|
|
Mon, 13 Nov 2006 06:50:50 -0800 |
| Namaste Ganga in special | Blessings Sat*Chit*Anand Shanti-Shanti-Shanti OM Love- Light - Great Peace & IS 0 |
| --- and some other readers too in general - like my long years friend Swami Prem Sakal! |
Namaste N0by - Great Morning - |
| For my understanding ''freedom means freedom'', something like a tool: a warrior will fight with and for freedom, maybe prostitutes, popes and politicians prefer 'freedom' to please and flatter. |
G there is even the *freedom* to continue to suffer. Flattery and pleasing as cajoling and fluff are not tools at all - they only feed the ego energy. True Freedom means Free without a need to be a warrior. When being a *warrior* then there is other being fought against. A constraint in place. No matter how free one feels that is caught up in the energies of being right. |
| When ''Free Speech'' hasn't the right for ''caustic slams'', what kind of ''Free Speech'' is left under the expectation for ''respect'' or for ''further explorations'' like ''Uplifting Cleaning''? Afraid of 'resorting to vulgarity'? Better avoid people like Eminen. |
G Not resulting to Vulgarity has nothing to do with being *afraid* to do so. It simply is not needed. A point may be made quite well as it is - the flourishes and waving of Vulgarity as some type of well honed bar room demeanor is simply not needed. Vulgarity takes very little to cultivate - it is a weed that grows when one has lost the art of communication heart to heart. Vulgarity remains in head to head. There is no avoidance - there is simply no rolling in it - no gathering or collecting of it. |
| When any avoidance of ''unwanted people and energies''
opens a door like to ''Blessings Sat*Chit*Anand Shanti-Shanti-Shanti OM Love- Light - Great Peace & IS 0'' - aren't these ''Shakti'' messengers with promises for the future New Age pesting Priests? |
G Not really - pesting *priests* ? priests of what ?
a profuse regurgitating dialog and diatribe of mind? Using the banner of free speech may be a way to simply not come from the Heart. One may be quite clear and direct such as you state *pesting* and not result to vulgarity and gutter tactics - one may be slicing and dicing to the bone on the matter - carving away at ignorance without needing to result to vulgarities. |
| My years old e-mail friend Swami Prem Sakal still fantasises
about ''You are just a victim of your own imagination.'' ''You are just a victim of your own imagination." ''You are just a victim of your own imagination." |
G one may be a victim of their imagination this is true. most often than not one may blow up an event to monumental proportions within their mind. Like one person that came - she had for 3 years gone in ever expanding circles absolutely convincing herself that she was going to go to the dentist - would have to have major surgery and would die in the midst of it. This fear Ran her life day in and day out. After coming and being confronted with this - she bit the bullet and went to the doctor. What was the result ? All that was needed was nothing more than a teeth cleaning. If she has confronted the fear at first dawning rather than entertaining it and feeding it with unproductive energies there would not have been 3 years of unneeded suffering. |
| But since years this poor
boy isn't even able to realise, or to feel or to understand, that he's continously under rough attack without respect of an awful troublemaker - but still the poor boy is happy to get my attention, LOL!
|
G well this is between the two of you. sounds like perhaps a co-dependent union. Many thrive off of these types of back and forth downings. Who can down the other best ? Who can draw first blood and who can continue to keep the ball in play. It is another game of mind - where is the heart in this ? Can one be Still in seeing and answer from the heart without resulting to name calling and vulgarities ? Absolutely ! Does one wish to ? that is another matter entirely - one may hide behind vulgarity it can be a screen just as being the perenial do gooder and idea that humility is about catering to egos by flattery and gooey speech. When speaking of having respect it is simply the aspect of standing toe to toe and speaking honestly and forthrightly without being degrading or needing to debase into wallowing in the mud. Unless both happen to enjoy a good mud bath. hahahahahaha |
| Oh, yes, who ever is willing and able may join this or any other kind of prayer like: ''Love & Light May we continue to pare away the layers until simply the One Indivisible Truth of IS remains. IS this or that is simply the One Light which has gone through the Prism of Shakti to create the varied aspects of Universe.'' Oh, yes, who ever is willing and able will continue to quarrel - like Bhagwan told and lived and has finished His voyage: ''In this age controversy is a must!'' |
G Controversy comes no matter what type of speech is used. Controversy comes when no longer catering to the religious status quo of dogmatic rules and bindings. A good guide is one that breaks the bondage of dogmatic rules and the externalized show. |
| no matter, if my floppy fingers find any messages going around the web - or life provides quarrels of an never seen quality and strength! |
G Quarrel or dialog without angst - it is a matter of perception - intention - and whether it is ego to ego or heart to heart. (maybe an over simplification but pointing in some type of directional understanding) Here simply Heart to Heart is preferred. Butting heads gets nothing except a huge headache, unless you happen to be a goat. hahahahahaa They seem to prefer to butt heads quite regularly. Each to their own. Enjoy and be happy. |
| n0by Hallelujah, Shalom, Inch'Allah, etc..... LOL |
Now on This we agree whole heartedly. may i join you in this ? Hallelujah, Shalom, Inch'Allah, etc..... |
back |
